Outrage over cops killing unarmed blacks: Why in THIS case, but not a peep in the other?

I’m trying to figure out why there’s epic riots over one police slaying of a black American, as in this case, riots so bad that the paramilitary cops finally got to use their military-type MRAP vehicles (“tanks”)…

… but there wasn’t any big deal made in this case, the infamous police execution of an unarmed woman in Washington, a slaying that wasn’t treated like a big deal at all by the same black rioters as in the other case.

I’m wondering… were the riots in the more recent case actually community-organized by agent provocateurs within the community?  What other explanation for the stark difference in both cases?

Read about both at each link.

You be the judge.


Justin Trudeau, Brother Alexandre, CBC & Iranian Ministry of Propaganda: The Connections

Oh, brother!

Not only is Justin Trudeau, son of former Liberal Prime Minister of Canada Pierre Trudeau and current Liberal Party Leader himself, a suspected closet Islamist, his brother Alexandre Trudeau, a top adviser of his, has been involved with propaganda operations of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its bogus claims regarding its nuclear program and smears and slurs against Israel.

Story HERE.


In the face of international condemnation of Iran’s destructive pursuit of nuclear weapons and its repeated calls for Israel’s destruction, filmmaker Alexandre Trudeau, son of the late Canadian prime minister Pierre Trudeau and senior advisor to his brother Justin’s campaign team for leadership of the Liberal party, reports that Iran’s atomic ambitions are for “defensive” purposes only, serving as an effective “deterrent” against Israeli “aggression” and belligerence. That is at least the way Trudeau framed the second instalment of his three-part documentary that aired on CBC’s The National on October 14.

Entitled The New Great Game, CBC lauded Trudeau’s film as a “special documentary for The National,” with the film’s proprietors and distributors listing CBC and its French counterpart SRC, as producers “in association.” Trudeau’s point-of-view documentary was described as investigating “how the movement of oil is shaping a new world order.” In reality, the only thing “special” about this film was how it singled Israel out for exclusive opprobrium while downplaying the grievous threat that a nuclear Iran poses to the Jewish state, the U.S., and the world.

UPDATE: Also listed in Alexandre Trudeau’s documentary “The New Great Game” as “producers in association,” but not acknowledged by the CBC, was Iran’s state-funded propaganda arm Press-TV, along with the reviled anti-Israel broadcaster Al-Jazeera Arabic, and the Media Education Foundation (producer of the anti-Israel film “Peace, Propaganda, and the Promised Land” found by CBC Radio-Canada’s ombudsman to be propaganda that never should have aired). CBC appearing alongside Iran’s hateful mouthpiece is damning enough. Did any of these producers provide financial, facilitation, or material support to this film that the CBC aired on national airwaves? Either way, CBC didn’t disclose this matter to its viewing audience.


Given this, can Canada take the dangerous risk of having Justin Trudeau as Prime Minister?

Warnings & Implorations By Kennedy Regarding Clear & Present Danger Facing America

During the Cold War, the Soviet Union, a dangerous, imperialistic, totalitarian empire hellbent on world domination and the destruction of America, engaged in covert operations of influence and subversion as well as espionage against the United States of America and her allies in the Free World.

President John F. Kennedy understood the nature of the threat from that monstrous enemy.  He gave a speech, some of which is excerpted below, regarding the danger and the dilemma facing America, the government and the press amidst the insidious, stealthy, subversive, covert enemy operations against America.

Important passages are selected and highlighted in boldface.  What Kennedy said in 1961 applies today as well, adjusted for differences and changes, of course.  Also, we see in Kennedy a President who was a REAL President.  Compare him to the fellow currently occupying the White House, Barack Hussein Obama, understood by those of us in the know, who understand, as “the manchurian president”, “the enemy within” and other descriptors. 

If only Kennedy’s warnings and implorations had been heeded, perhaps America wouldn’t be in the critical existential, constitutional crisis she’s facing as this post is written.


President John F. Kennedy speech, Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City, April 27, 1961



…..For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

     Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

     Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security–and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.

     For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.

     The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

 It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed–and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment– the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply “give the public what it wants”–but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.



An area just outside of the little town of Bunkerville, Nevada, with a population of around a thousand people, may go down in history. This little spot in the desert may be compared with Lexington, Massachusetts, the site of the “shot heard round the world” – the first shot fired in the American Revolution. Because it looks like the second American Revolution may start there…and soon.

Yesterday, The Daily Sheeple reported that tensions were running high outside of Bunkerville. It seems that the US government, in all of their infinite wisdom, has declared war on a cattle rancher named Cliven Bundy.


Read the REST.


In a word, this is Mengellian, the sort of thing the Nazi “Doctors” would perform on Jews and others during the Third Reich and the Holocaust. 

What kind of ethics and morals do the people of the Obama Regime have?

In February of 2013, JunkScience.com reported that the EPA gave USC money in the mid 2000’s to find out whether diesel exhaust could “induce reproducible gene expression” in children. From a USC grant in the EPA extramural research grants database, the original December 14, 2012 document showed diesel exposures to children. What now sits on that database is a strongly edited description of the diesel tests on the children. Part of the the experiment’s goal was to examine how particulate matter affects “Asthma in Susceptible Children.”

Read the REST




ImageObama’s regime did something along this line…


Shocking.  Inhuman.  It’s happening again.  And in America.  Part of Obama’s “Hope & Change” and “Forward” agenda, which sounds eerily familiar.


The Environmental Protection Agency has been conducting dangerous experiments on humans over the past few years in order to justify more onerous clean air regulations.

The agency conducted tests on people with health issues and the elderly, exposing them to high levels of potentially lethal pollutants, without disclosing the risks of cancer and death, according to a newly released government report.

These experiments exposed people, including those with asthma and heart problems, to dangerously high levels of toxic pollutants, including diesel fumes, reads a EPA inspector general report obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The EPA also exposed people with health issues to levels of pollutants up to 50 times greater than the agency says is safe for humans.

The EPA conducted five experiments in 2010 and 2011 to look at the health effects of particulate matter, or PM, and diesel exhaust on humans. The IG’s report found that the EPA did get consent forms from 81 people in five studies. But the IG also found that “exposure risks were not always consistently represented.”


Whole story HERE.







One Israeli Jew is Too Many?  Really, Obama?

Obama’s anti-Semitic, anti-Israel hatred is manifesting itself ever-so-blatantly…

Remember, the Obama regime’s excuses are to be disbelieved because this regime has zero credibility, zero integrity and is infamous for its hatred and discrimination against Israel, Israels and Jews, whilst enouraging unlimited intrusion and staying by illegal aliens from Mexico, including drug gangsters infamous for murder and even beheading, including inside America.  Obama’s regime also has a fast-track regime in place for Muslim immigration en masse like never before.  It is clear what its agenda really is.

Among younger Israelis, the visa issue has put a damper on plans for a post-army trip to America, a common rite of passage after completing three or more years of compulsory military service. For this demographic, the American concern appears to be less a matter of security and rather a fear that they will abuse their tourist visas to work illegally and peddle products at malls.

Yoav Rosenbaum, 23, said he had no such intention. He and three friends just wanted to go on a 10-day trip to the New York area to see a comedy festival. But even though he holds down a hi-tech job, rents an apartment in Tel Aviv and lived in the U.S for the three years when he was younger, he was immediately rejected at the American embassy.

“I brought documents, showed my return flight and the tickets to the festival, paid the fee and the guy just looked at me and said ‘it’s not going to happen,'” he recalled, saying the official told him he didn’t have enough ties to Israel to be trusted to return. “I wasn’t that shocked because I knew that they give a hard time to people of my age group.”

It hasn’t stopped dozens of others from lining up outside the American embassy in Tel Aviv to seek visas on a daily basis.

For the Israeli government, the larger issue is membership in the Visa Waiver Program.

As one of America’s closest allies, Israel wonders why countries like Slovakia, Iceland and Latvia qualify while they are left out.





The Obama regime in America has decided to let a “global governance” regime take over America’s internet governance.

It’s not entirely clear what this means.  Some say it merely means little basic things, but we know how these things turn out, going far beyond what the proponents of the change are willing to admit, and it’s often undesirable.

Story HERE


U.S. officials announced plans Friday to relinquish federal government control over the administration of the Internet, a move that pleased international critics but alarmed some business leaders and others who rely on the smooth functioning of the Web.

Pressure to let go of the final vestiges of U.S. authority over the system of Web addresses and domain names that organize the Internet has been building for more than a decade and was supercharged by the backlash last year to revelations about National Security Agency surveillance.


Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) called the move “consistent with other efforts the U.S. and our allies are making to promote a free and open Internet, and to preserve and advance the current multi-stakeholder model of global Internet governance.”

But former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) tweeted: “What is the global internet community that Obama wants to turn the internet over to? This risks foreign dictatorships defining the internet.”

The practical consequences of the decision were harder to immediately discern, especially with the details of the transition not yet clear.

Personally, I fail to see why there must be a global governing body, rather than cooperation globally between sovereign national internet governing authorities.

The danger lies within the kind of global-governing regime there would be, and what kind of people, what kind of puppetmasters, minions, organizational culture and controls there would be.  Would it be one in which they merely keep things working properly, smoothly and in a globally-coordinated, cooperative manner, or is this a trojan horse to some form of communications tyranny vis a vis the internet?  All kinds of serious, scary questions arise.  Can you imagine the potential consequences of global governance over the internet?

Global government, also known, actually, as the “New World Order”, infamously alluded to by former US President George HW Bush, is planned to be created in a creeping, insidious, almost imperceptible way, over time, with one thing after another being turned over to a global governance entity.  The people will not notce it until it’s too late, unfortunately.  And they’ll be conditioned by mass propaganda media mechanisms to dismiss the whole idea as a silly, loony “conspiracy theory” even though they can see for themselves the very reality unfolding and progressing before their eyes, affecting their daily lives, in fact.




Machine guns being used on freedom fighters in Ukraine by tyrant regime stooge of Russia’s Putin


My world turned black and white today

Inside the Revolution in Kiev, Ukraine

Euromaidan PR


Mychailo Wynnyckyj:

Feeling very sad and incredibly angry. My city burns tonight. The capital of the country that I love (my adopted home and the land of my ancestors), today lost any sense of innocence that may have been left here. Tonight the center of Kyiv has become a war zone.

This place of peace, of multiple languages and religions, of intellectual vibrancy, of tolerance and mutual understanding, today is drenched in the blood of protesters whose only demand was to be led by a just and non-corrupt government.

As I write these words, the church tent on the Maidan where I have prayed for peace countless times during the past 2 months, burns – set on fire by riot police. Don’t look for logic behind such an act – there is no logic that can explain the work of thugs taking orders from an uber-thug desperately holding on to…

View original post 202 more words